Al-Bashir Case: ICC confirms Jordan’s non-cooperation but reverses the decision referring it to the U.N. Security Council

The International Criminal Court on Monday reversed the decision to refer Jordan to the U.N. Security Council for its failure to arrest Sudanese war crimes suspect Omar al-Bashir when he visited Amman in 2017, judges said on Monday, reversing an earlier decision.

The ICC issued two arrest warrants against Mr Al-Bashir for five counts of crimes against humanity

Bashir, who was ousted in April after 30 years in power, is the subject of two ICC arrest warrants over his alleged role in war crimes including genocide in Sudan’s Darfur province.

In the appeal brought by the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan , the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Court has confirm the decision of ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II, that it found that Jordan, a State Party to the ICC Rome Statute since 2002, had failed to comply with its obligations by not arresting Mr Omar Al-Bashir was on Jordanian territory attending the League of Arab States’ Summit on 29 March 2017.

The Appeals Chamber, noting the particular circumstances of this case, decided by majority to reverse the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber to refer the matter of Jordan’s non-compliance to the Assembly of States Parties and the United Nations Security Council.

The Appeals Chamber held that article 27(2) of the ICC Rome Statute, stipulating that immunities are not a bar to the exercise of jurisdiction, reflects the status of customary international law. It concluded that there is no Head of State immunity under customary international law vis-à-vis an international court.

The Appeals Chamber further found, by majority, that the Pre-Trial Chamber had erroneously exercised its discretion in referring Jordan’s non-compliance to the Assembly of States Parties  (ASP) and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) , based on an incorrect conclusion that Jordan had not sought consultations with the Court.

The dissenting judges would have found that the Pre-Trial Chamber did not err or abuse its discretion, and would have confirmed Jordan’s referral to the ASP and the UNSC. The dissenting judges consider that this referral is not punitive in nature or a sanction imposed upon Jordan. Rather, it is a call for action with the aim of fostering cooperation with the Court and enabling the effective realisation of the high values and objectives enshrined in the ICC Rome Statute.

Before deciding on the appeal brought by Jordan, the Appeals Chamber invited Sudan, Mr Al-Bashir, other states and international and regional organisations as well as professors of international law to submit written observations on the matters raised in the appeal and held a hearing.

Judge Eboe-Osuji, Judge Morrison, Judge Hofmański and Judge Bossa append a joint concurring opinion to this judgment on grounds one and two of the appeal. Judge Ibañez and Judge Bossa append a joint dissenting opinion to this judgment on ground three of the appeal.

On 4 March 2009 and 12 July 2010, respectively, the ICC issued two arrest warrants against Mr Al-Bashir for five counts of crimes against humanity (murder, extermination, forcible transfer, torture and rape), two counts of war crimes (intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking part in hostilities, and pillaging), and three counts of genocide allegedly committed against the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa ethnic groups in Darfur, Sudan, from 2003 to 2008.

Categories: Politics

Tags: , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: